Trust instead of deception

How to avoid greenwashing

Anyone who communicates achievements in the area of sustainability is walking a fine line. We support you in formulating credible statements without greenwashing.

Since January 1, 2025, the greenwashing amendment to the Federal Act Against Unfair Competition (UWG) has been in force in Switzerland. Companies must therefore ensure that their climate statements are objective and verifiable. And there are further requirements:

Federal Act on the Reduction of CO2 Emissions

The supplement to environmental claims is legally binding. Since 2025, it has included a supplement on misleading climate claims. It protects consumers.

Swiss Commission for Fairness in Environmental Issues

Compliance with the guidelines is voluntary. They support companies in their communications and advertising relating to the environment and climate.

Green Claims Initiative

Controversial requirement by the European Commission. Not yet in force. Significant penalties would be foreseen.

This applies:

According to the Federal Act on Unfair Competition, companies must ensure that their statements on climate impact are:

objective: statements must not be exaggerated or fabricated,

verifiable: claims must be substantiated with data, certificates, or other evidence.

Information should be presented in a clear, understandable, and comprehensible manner so that customers or partners can correctly assess the statements.

With its green marketing guidelines, the Fairness Commission supports Swiss companies with concrete examples.

Problematic Wording:

  • Vague terms without evidence – such as “environmentally friendly,” “green,” or ‘sustainable’
  • Superlatives – such as “100% ecological” or “the most sustainable solution”
  • Comparisons without basis – such as “better than other products” 
  • General statements without evidence – such as “good for the environment” or “climate neutral” 


Problematic symbols and images:

  • Nature photographs unrelated to the company—such as trees, leaves, or water
  • Green logos or icons that suggest sustainability without evidence to support this claim
  • Self-invented seals or labels without external standards

Statements that must be substantiated with data:

Environmental statements

“environmentally friendly,” “climate neutral,” “resource-efficient”

Ethical statements

“fairly produced”, “socially responsible”, “equitable”

General assertions

“sustainable”, “ecological”, “responsible”

Avoid greenwashing – workshops for your team

In our workshop, we prepare your team for sustainability communication without greenwashing. We tailor the workshop to your individual needs. Your team will leave the workshop feeling empowered and ready for credible, effective communication.

16. Dezember 2025

Webinar: keine Angst vor Ihrem ersten Nachhaltigkeitsreport

Wie KMU ihren ersten Nachhaltigkeitsbericht schreiben und ihn gewinnbringend nutzen. Ohne Vorwissen. Ohne perfekte Daten. Und ohne grosses Budget. 30 Minuten kostenloses Kompakt-Webinar. Direkt aus der Praxis.

10. Dezember 2025

Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung 2025: unser Rück- und Ausblick

Auch in diesem Jahr haben wir zahlreiche Kundinnen und Kunden bei der Umsetzung ihrer Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung unterstützt. Hier kommen unsere Key Takeaways 2025.

28. November 2025

XBRL im ESG-Reporting

Was genau bedeutet die Abkürzung XBRL? Und welche Rolle spielt das sogenannte XBRL-Tagging bei der Realisation von Nachhaltigkeitsberichten? Die Fakten im Überblick.